Schooling Children with Down Syndrome by Freire, Greene and Kliewer Essay

Schooling Children with fell Syndrome by Freire, Greene and Kliewer - Essay ExampleIn this banking concept of pedagogy students are seen as adaptable, manageable beings. The more students work at storing the deposits entrusted to them, the less they develop the critical consciousness which would result from their intervention in the realism as transformers of that world. (Friere, 1997, p.54) Under this system not only is there a supposed knowledge imbalance between the teacher and the pupil, only if the former also holds professional authority that is not always grounded on merit. Moreover, this banking education minimizes or annuls the students creative energies so as to serve the interests of the oppressors, whose primary motive is not turn up or critical inquiry. To the contrary, under the humanitarian veil of the educators lies their intention to perpetuate the status quo. Maxine Greenes phrase titled training for Social Justice is similar in tenor to that of Paulo Freir es. The history of human societies is unspoiled of instances of the privileged few (the oppressors) dominating the majority rest through explicit and implicit means. Where brute embrace proved unviable, sophisticated indoctrination through education ensured domination. Further, the privileged few were the ones with the opportunities to map and dominate the linguistic universe. The imbalance, the undeserved advantages in that domain as well as in the socioeconomic and political worlds is evidences of the most glare social in justness. (Greene, 1988 p.29) It is in this context that an educational system be devised, whose end is to ensure that each citizen is at the least entitled to develop and build his/her intellectual, social, emotional, and expressive capacities. (Greene, 1988, p.29) Consistent with the arguments made by Paulo Freire, Marine Greene too advocates a new way of looking at our educational institutions and their underlying motives. Contrary to what the system produ ces, she espouses Teaching for Social Justice. Here, teaching is to project what we believe ought to be not merely where moral frameworks are concerned, but in material arrangements for people in all spheres of society. Moreover, teaching for social justice is teaching for the sake of arousing the kinds of vivid, reflective, experiential responses that might move students to come together in serious efforts to understand what social justice actually means and what it might demand. (Greene, 1988, p.30) Kliewers article focusing on the special needs of chain reactor syndrome children is also of a similar vein to the other two articles. The author feels that current understanding of this wellness condition and schooling possibilities for children afflicted with it is quite limited. (Kliewer, 1988) And hence educators should be more open and inclusive of children of varied capabilities as they draw up their curricula. In essence, there is much convergence in the content and driving of the three articles as they express their concern about mainstream education today. After having read these three articles and base on my own educational experience in childhood, I am mostly in engagement with the views expressed by Freire, Greene and Kliewer. Formal education is something most children in our country have the privilege of attending. To its credit, the education system in the United States has extended literacy and math skills to several generations of students. As a result, the country general has become more educated. The percentage of young adults passing high-school